3rdPersonPlural
10-29-2007, 03:05 PM
From Alan Scwartz's article in the New York Times on Saturday (10/27)
"Vin Ferrara, a former Harvard quarterback, was looking for an aspirin in his medicine cabinet when his eyes fixed upon a ribbed plastic bottle used to squirt saline into sinuses. Ferrara squeezed the bottle, then pounded on it — finding that it cushioned soft and hard blows with equal aplomb, almost intelligence........Rather than being lined with rows of traditional foam or urethane, Ferrara’s helmet features 18 black, thermoplastic shock absorbers filled with air that — not unlike his squirt bottle — can accept a wide range of forces and still moderate the sudden jarring of the head that causes concussion. Moreover, laboratory tests have shown that the disks can withstand hundreds of impacts without any notable degradation in performance, a longtime drawback of helmets’ traditional foam."
The big question is which Helmet manufacturer is going to license this superior technology for lacrosse helmets?
More about the helmet at http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/27/sports/football/27helmets.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin
or
www.xenith.com
or
http://press.page2go2.com/0209737.html
The other big question: Would parents/players/teams/schools pay double for a helmet that is better than any other available model?
"Vin Ferrara, a former Harvard quarterback, was looking for an aspirin in his medicine cabinet when his eyes fixed upon a ribbed plastic bottle used to squirt saline into sinuses. Ferrara squeezed the bottle, then pounded on it — finding that it cushioned soft and hard blows with equal aplomb, almost intelligence........Rather than being lined with rows of traditional foam or urethane, Ferrara’s helmet features 18 black, thermoplastic shock absorbers filled with air that — not unlike his squirt bottle — can accept a wide range of forces and still moderate the sudden jarring of the head that causes concussion. Moreover, laboratory tests have shown that the disks can withstand hundreds of impacts without any notable degradation in performance, a longtime drawback of helmets’ traditional foam."
The big question is which Helmet manufacturer is going to license this superior technology for lacrosse helmets?
More about the helmet at http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/27/sports/football/27helmets.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin
or
www.xenith.com
or
http://press.page2go2.com/0209737.html
The other big question: Would parents/players/teams/schools pay double for a helmet that is better than any other available model?