PDA

View Full Version : Shocker vs. SFII


BAlax19
03-29-2008, 01:56 PM
It has come time to get new gloves and it has come down to two choices. I'm not asking which one is the best, but if anybody has used them

Here are the things i want to know

-How are the palms
-Hows the feel on the stick
-Are they lightweight
-Which is a better value

Lacrosse4life31
03-29-2008, 02:00 PM
Superfreak II's are basically upgraded shockers...
I don't know about the shockers, but the palms on the sfII's are okay, I like them because they are durable palms, but my only complaint is that they don't have the best grip.

They feel like every other glove on a stick... the palms aren't super thick, but they aren't thin like STX gloves

If you complain about the weight of your GLOVES, then you REALLY need to go the gym.

I would go with SFII's. Like I said earlier, they are just upgraded shockers.

m2daRizzle
03-29-2008, 02:08 PM
shockers are the lightest gloves. the are waterproof. the palm is nice, They arent to thick but arent thin enough that they will get destroyed. And on top of that the shockers are cheaper and you get a great glove for your money. I would go with shockers.

And Im pretty sure Superfreak II's are updated superfreaks, not shockers. that kind of the whole reason they named them superfreak II's

UNCLax12
03-29-2008, 02:10 PM
I got a pair of BN Freak IIs for a great price and I love them. It was between them or shockers actually, and the SF IIs are just more durable, more comfortable, better looking, way easier to break in, etc., although the shockers are lighter, not 40% like advertised... but anyway if you think gloves are heavy, like Lacrosse4life31 said, you really need to hit the gym

laxkid44
03-29-2008, 03:52 PM
i would definitely go with the shockers. they are cheaper for the same quality. better deal!!!!!!!!!!!

BAlax19
03-29-2008, 04:00 PM
i would definitely go with the shockers. they are cheaper for the same quality. better deal!!!!!!!!!!!

and you answering my question was helpful too!