View Full Version : Your Preference; GForces or Superfreaks
sweet_ceX
08-05-2005, 04:46 PM
Make you descicion if youve tried them and if u havnt make your descicion on looks.
JedimasterKyle
08-05-2005, 04:55 PM
I have the G-forces and my teammate has the freaks. I like the G-forces because it is less bulky and has better durability, plus better protection.
If you play attack or mostly offensive middie then you should use the G-force.. I have (NJ Pride issue) superfreaks, I have G-force, and I have 5 pair of Supercrosse including one pair issued to UNC players..and I prefer the Supercrosse, but I would use the G-force over the superfreaks any day.. I almost got my finger broken in the superfreaks, they have no protection for the side of the fingers, and the top of the fingers are so flimsy your finger can easily bend backwards at the knuckle from a pole check on the top of the fingers.. Everyone knows that superfreaks suck for attackmen.. su91
Garor
08-05-2005, 06:20 PM
Which one is better for goalies? I have the superfreak goalies and (of course) they're ripping at the seams. They won't hold up much longer. Which is better?
BioPro29
08-05-2005, 06:57 PM
I almost got my finger broken in the superfreaks, they have no protection for the side of the fingers, and the top of the fingers are so flimsy your finger can easily bend backwards at the knuckle from a pole check on the top of the fingers su91
yeah, a guy on my team who had freaks got the side of his finger nailed pretty bad in a game. so much For $150 gloves.
laxattack8888
08-05-2005, 07:13 PM
Garor, I did vote freaks earlier, but the g-forces are the better glove overall in durability, strength, grip, and they have the same flexibility. The only thing is that they don't have a goalie-specific g-force glove, so you would have to use the normal ones without the goalie thumb. It's your choice though. If you don't get many thumb shots or problems, then the g-forces may be a good investment for you. The reason I voted freaks by the way is that I don't like the g-force thumb right out of the box; it is very stff and wide, but I'm sure when they're broken in it's amazing.
laxattack22
08-05-2005, 07:55 PM
everyone knows superfreaks suck for attackmen.. su91[/QUOTE]
what are u saying.?? i am an attackman and i know that the superfreaks kill ne glove on the market..the have the best flexability for the best protection and they have great wear the last for a long time..so i guess everyone dosn't know :imparied: :dummy: :banghead:
allyearlax
08-05-2005, 08:59 PM
pshhh just get insanities. after i lost my spartans, i got them. Sooo nice. Well, I gues g-forces and superfreaks might be nicer but they're really expensive
sweet_ceX
08-05-2005, 11:10 PM
at this pointpoll is tied 12 to 12
I like my gforces but im wondering if i should go for the more comfortable reallytight superfreaks...
Superman
08-06-2005, 12:18 AM
id go with the G forces.. i like them
creaseattack
08-06-2005, 01:12 AM
I like the freak palms how they are tight on your hands and you get an awesome grip although they lack the finger protection the g-forces have I dont like the palms (only with gait shafts with the octagonal grip) because of how loose they are and I dont like the cuffs the freak cuffs are awesome they go right up to the edge of my ventxs unlike my gforces I would rather have a broken finger and flex then a broken arm because I have had my forearm hairline fractured from a pole hitting me so large cuffs are essential for me.