The Descriptions Thread?! *Suggestion*

[titanVision]

Ok I have this in my other forum i go to for gaming and stuff. It may lead to flamming and stuff but u set rules. Like No mean comments. Cause the descriptions thread is for fun! and it can be funny alot!

Well let me explain.
Someone starts out saying the rules and all. Next person to post directly talks to the person to post before them.
First post:

Formerlaxdemon:
*START* Hi

Vision:
(FormerlaxDemon)Needs to be funny : (

Warrior:
(Vision)Cant be funny

You dont actually say whats in the ( ) thats who the comment is going to.

whatever u say u add the last posters name in front of it, the next one in that would be towards Warrior

Its basically for fun and whoever gets mad at anything or take it personal its there problem cause they post there and this whole thing is a joke and its funny.

I like it in my other forum (kodgamers.com) but u have to be a KOD member to see it. Its really funny and I love it, we use it to be funny.

If you mods dont like it, it's ok.

[ekajsk8er]

It's considered post raising, and probably wont fly. I could also see it becoming a flame war very easily.

We've had games like this before that have gotten locked up quickly. I don't really understand it either....

[AttackSniper#12]

i get it, and i think it would be a fun idea. ekajs8er, if you dont understand it ill try to explaine it.


Warrior says: ok guys, this is the thread that titanVision wanted so, lets start!


ekajsk8er says: ooo nice start Warrior *sarcasm*


titanVision says: the first post doesnt have to be a good/funny one ekaj


AttackSniper#12 says: exactly. but i agree with ekaj, it isnt too good of a post. WAY TO START THE THREAD OFF *sarcasm* (not an attack at warrior, just an example)


get it now ekaj?

[titanVision]

"is right"

yet u dont say the posters name in any post.

if this was the thread it will be like what i said first in quotes.

So what I said, AttackSniper#12 is right

[atacklax]

However, during crowded times, you might end up with multiple responses to the same post.

[zak]

It's considered post raising, and probably wont fly
Ahhh young grassshoppaaa. Without post count.... what is post raising? Without water.... what is flood? Without Paris Hilton... who the hell is Nichole Ritchie?

[ekajsk8er]

Ehh yeah I think I get it.

Ahhh young grassshoppaaa. Without post count.... what is post raising? Without water.... what is flood? Without Paris Hilton... who the hell is Nichole Ritchie?

Right after I posted that I was wondering if that was even a rule anymore because of no post counts, but figured it kinda fits in with spamming and didn't bother to edit. I still don't think this will go down to well.

[titanVision]

It would be cool if it did go *down* because i always thought it was the funniest thing ever! But yea, maybe the mods can make it so the posts in that part wont count towards ur post count? just like the Trading forum..?

[A-D-I-D-A-S]

I think you shouldnt even be able to see your post count because theres still a reason to post whore so you can have youre little celebration for 1000 post or w/e.

[atacklax]

I think you shouldnt even be able to see your post count because theres still a reason to post whore so you can have youre little celebration for 1000 post or w/e.
But honestly, if noone can see your post count, why not have the party at 700?