Who's gonna coach MCC......?? [Archive]

Corduroy

10-09-2006, 06:36 AM

......Now that Kenny Nichols has been moved aside?? Hmmm? Could it be Benerdeirks, D.Joy, and Mighty Murray Keen. My tip is the latter, just so as to reunite the Caulfield crew of 2003. Toss JT into the mix and the jobs done.

Now they have a years experience under their belt they could be a real threat!

Any takers...??

Peace,

'Roy Boy

whistleblower

10-09-2006, 07:18 AM

Not yet...

Still need more depth??

Brian Bell got offered an interview don't forget!

cannon

10-09-2006, 07:24 AM

haha, Bell got an interview. Blast from the past eh? looking for the mid nineties glory.

whistleblower

10-09-2006, 07:30 AM

Nah I'm pretty sure he declined the interview....is this grasping at straws??

fairy

10-09-2006, 06:15 PM

my moneys on MMK...

Corduroy

10-09-2006, 11:21 PM

If it was Belly - he'd be likely coaching via correspondence. Probably from down Sale or Castlemaine way.

endoftheline

10-10-2006, 06:39 AM

I doubt it will be Dave Joy he stepped down from Malvern claiming he wants a break from lacrosse.

laxpigmi2005

10-10-2006, 06:45 AM

I would say Dave Joy maybe. Because he knows the youngsters and is also a great coach.

But at this stage it could be anyone.

fairy

10-11-2006, 06:31 PM

I would say Dave Joy maybe. Because he knows the youngsters and is also a great coach.

But at this stage it could be anyone.

told ya already....Keane

piperlax

10-12-2006, 06:45 AM

who ever gets the gig has the potential to take mcc to god knows how many SL grannys (assuming he knows his lax) cant believe more coaches arnt jumping at the oppertunity to coach some of the boys down there bullock, both hydes, desmond, eagen, johnson, williams(when he finds out he aint that quick, he'll be bak) belfour, all of which have at least 10-12 years of SL lax left in them. not to mention starkie arnell and possibly JT. tell me if u were a retired lax player who new ya **** that you wouldn't be drooling at the chance to coach that?

fairy

10-12-2006, 07:35 AM

great insight p.lax....right on all counts add cam shepherd in the mix-

snake

10-12-2006, 06:48 PM

who ever gets the gig has the potential to take mcc to god knows how many SL grannys (assuming he knows his lax) cant believe more coaches arnt jumping at the oppertunity to coach some of the boys down there bullock, both hydes, desmond, eagen, johnson, williams(when he finds out he aint that quick, he'll be bak) belfour, all of which have at least 10-12 years of SL lax left in them. not to mention starkie arnell and possibly JT. tell me if u were a retired lax player who new ya **** that you wouldn't be drooling at the chance to coach that?
When are these 'grannys' gonna start flowing in?

viclaxx

10-12-2006, 07:26 PM

When are these 'grannys' gonna start flowing in?

If they play Div 1 I would say next year!

If they play s/l maybe when the Melbourne C ricket Club makes a compulsory move to make all Voting members that are Lacrosse Players have to play for MCC???

FAT CHANCE.......to many egos not enough brains!

snake

10-12-2006, 07:34 PM

If they play Div 1 I would say next year!

If they play s/l maybe when the Melbourne C ricket Club makes a compulsory move to make all Voting members that are Lacrosse Players have to play for MCC???

FAT CHANCE.......to many egos not enough brains!

OK...I realy meant when are the SL grannys gonna start flowing?

Cutter

10-12-2006, 07:48 PM

i don't understand how that team underachieved so badly this year....

laxmcc

10-12-2006, 08:06 PM

hey guys, i play under 15's in melbourne, i also played southern this year, good coaching is a definate asset to the game of lacrosse (as demonstrated in the melbourne tournament last week)

as to your question "why did mcc under achieve so bad this year?"

they under acheieved because they were missing so many players per game

atleast 12 players went to the world games, playing or watching. we had under 17's and even people young enough to play 15's playing state league.

MCC are an awesome team and have extreme skils but need more depth in their lineups.

and coaches, go to mcc, everyone loves the coach down here!!

Cutter

10-12-2006, 08:38 PM

i guess depth is the issue....but both Willy and Eltham had sh!tloads of players missing.......and Surrey had none missing.......and all made the finals!

swankylaxer

10-12-2006, 10:01 PM

Surrey did have players out throughout the season, Ben waite(Broken Thumb) Chris Robertson(AC joint), Dave Spread sat alot of games on the bench carrying leg injuries, Danny whitt, played only 14 games, Andy whitt missed 2 games at the end of the season due to a barny with the coach....................Still made the finals

Cutter

10-12-2006, 10:04 PM

that's called playing a season.....every team gets injuries during the year.....

swankylaxer

10-12-2006, 10:07 PM

yeah thats what I'm saying...... there are no excuses

Jay Jay

10-12-2006, 10:44 PM

I heard Brad Kendall is interested at coaching.
I've seem him play against MCC he seems to have a good working relationship with MCC.
I reckon give him a go.

whistleblower

10-12-2006, 11:27 PM

Oh yeah he loves them all right......I think Kenny Nicholas and him are really good mates or something!

old'D'man

10-13-2006, 06:19 AM

was'nt Jimmy from eltham lovers with kenny nichols once, maybe he could coach them, maybe even a game here and there

piperlax

11-16-2006, 09:58 PM

keen got the gig

Hally

11-16-2006, 10:09 PM

If they play Div 1 I would say next year!

If they play s/l maybe when the Melbourne C ricket Club makes a compulsory move to make all Voting members that are Lacrosse Players have to play for MCC???

FAT CHANCE.......to many egos not enough brains!

This is on the money except they will not even win div1 next season

fairy

11-16-2006, 11:26 PM

refer posting 12/10

fairy

05-31-2007, 05:19 PM

......Now that Kenny Nichols has been moved aside?? Hmmm? Could it be Benerdeirks, D.Joy, and Mighty Murray Keen. My tip is the latter, just so as to reunite the Caulfield crew of 2003. Toss JT into the mix and the jobs done.

Now they have a years experience under their belt they could be a real threat!

Any takers...??

Peace,

'Roy Boy

you picked it 'Roy!!............time will tell

Corduroy

05-31-2007, 09:04 PM

Time will tell Fairy - true. MCC will be tested once again against Surrey this week. Whilst they got away with a one goal OT win against an undermanned Willy, they may not be a fortunate this week. Prediction - Surrey by 3.

In saying that they have certainly turned things around this season very well. Helps having a coach who is level headed, and players consistently in the mix.

Other predictions for round 5:

Eltham by 18
Willy by 6
Camberwell by 6.

Peace and GL for the w/end.

Roy.

Hally

06-07-2007, 10:31 PM

MCC will never win they are good on paper as individuals but no good on the field as a team. they are way to soft and whinge way to much to be any good.

fairy

06-07-2007, 10:47 PM

MCC will never win they are good on paper as individuals but no good on the field as a team. they are way to soft and whinge way to much to be any good.

so far only 1 loss by 2 goals............. they mustb doin sumthin right as a team

laxmcc

06-09-2007, 08:05 PM

MCC will never win they are good on paper as individuals but no good on the field as a team. they are way to soft and whinge way to much to be any good.

mcc top of state league??

laxdude136

06-09-2007, 09:45 PM

mcc are not top

laxorgy

06-10-2007, 01:05 AM

roy
what club you from?

laxmcc

06-10-2007, 01:39 AM

mcc are not top

my bad 3rd
top last week
still means they hav bin winning