Would adding Mike be good or bad?

[statboy2]

It doesn't look like Mike will play for Baltimore, so if he were traded to Rochester, would it be a good move or a bad move? Mike Powell has the potential to be one of the best in the MLL even as a rookie, but considering Rochester's recent success and what they would have to give up to get Mike, would he really be worth it?

Assume that Rochester would have to trade 2 of the following players and a 1st rounder:

Cassese
Shannon
Ward

I think this is a reasonable scenario as these guys are young and better than Coffman so Baltimore would want them more.

[jmplax31]

NO, team is fine! He is great will be a good star someday, but leave the team be!

[MontclairLax]

i have a feeling that next year when the league (hopefully) expands baltimore will trade their rights to mike powell to an expansion team

[Stopper22]

defanitly do nto add him unless it costs us very littel in the way of attack players. do not trade any middies or D for him, if they can use some of our depth at attack to get him then that is fine. Rember there is also a good chance the Grant will be back at the end of the season, exspecally if we are going to the playoffs.

[dclayton28]

dont add him let him come to seattle

[timmy]

he'll end up with the colorado team.

[powellfan1]

Add him and watch MLL history unfold.

[Aussie_kid]

Coffman is Killing, Casey is Mudering behind, Ryan is having a free year without the knee brace. Having Mike could free up Casey and or Ryan even more.