BGun
05-10-2007, 07:02 PM
A couple of days ago we had the most bizarre high school game that i have ever been a part of. First the refs seemed to favor one team, but then they completely switched and started making (what i thought were) horrible calls. The game is over and my team lost, and i've kind of gotten past it, but there was one call in particular that I have a question about.
It is the middle of the third quarter, and each team has scored a couple of goals. One player on my team had been warned earlier in the game about his celebrations after scoring. He scores again, does a little celebration. After the ref sees the refery calls a stick check on him. The two things I thought were fishy about it were:
1. I wasn't aware that refs could pick him out like that for a stick check. I know you are supposed to check the first goal of each quarter, but i didn't know they could pick him out like that
2. The player had already had his stick called for a check by the other team, where it was found to be leagal, but they still checked it again.
3. The ref called a 3 minute non-relesable on him for his stick, and when the refery was asked what was illigal about the stick and if he could demonstarte what was illigal, he said no, that it was just illigal.
I apologize if I sound like I am ranting, because I am trying not to, I was just wondering about what the rules say.
Any insight on this situation would be very helpful. Thanks alot!
It is the middle of the third quarter, and each team has scored a couple of goals. One player on my team had been warned earlier in the game about his celebrations after scoring. He scores again, does a little celebration. After the ref sees the refery calls a stick check on him. The two things I thought were fishy about it were:
1. I wasn't aware that refs could pick him out like that for a stick check. I know you are supposed to check the first goal of each quarter, but i didn't know they could pick him out like that
2. The player had already had his stick called for a check by the other team, where it was found to be leagal, but they still checked it again.
3. The ref called a 3 minute non-relesable on him for his stick, and when the refery was asked what was illigal about the stick and if he could demonstarte what was illigal, he said no, that it was just illigal.
I apologize if I sound like I am ranting, because I am trying not to, I was just wondering about what the rules say.
Any insight on this situation would be very helpful. Thanks alot!