View Full Version : Tewaaraton Winners Announced!
Just checked the website the winners are.......... MATT DANOWSKI AND KRISTEN KJELLMAN! I think most people kind of expected that, although Danowski is one of the few to win it without winning the championship (Doug Shanahan only other). Good job to all the other finalists. Well heres the link: http://www.tewaaraton.com/home/183010.html
Got it before IL..
MVHSlax14
05-30-2007, 09:49 PM
sweet, Danowski deserves it with his play during this season
KUjayhawks42
05-30-2007, 09:49 PM
Thats awesome! I hope Danowski will come back and maybe win it again
Auburn10
05-30-2007, 09:53 PM
Glad he won it, he deserves it... Rabil will get it next year if he has as good of a season/if not better one...
Eclipse
05-30-2007, 09:53 PM
Awesome, Im glad Danowski's performance in the championship didnt affect him winning the trophy.
EHSLAX12
05-30-2007, 09:54 PM
i dont thing danowski will come back to play. he will probably go into the draft. well, maybe he will because his father is coaching. i actually thought that paul rabil deserved it more for that game, but i guess it didnt go that way.
^ yea true but they emphasize that it is about the season most of all, and for most consistent play it was Danowski, I'm a fan of Rabil but he had a slow frustrating start (as did the rest of Hopkins). IL has a good write up now http://www.insidelacrosse.com/page.cfm?pagerid=2&news=fdetail&storyid=166008
Farny
05-30-2007, 10:42 PM
Haha. I bet $5 on Danowski winning.
In the IL write-up: "Danowski is one of just three players in ACC history to earn both Rookie of the Year and Player of the Year honors."
Don't they mean in the same year? Because I don't see that being so difficult (that only 3 players have done it) otherwise.
bushleague24
05-31-2007, 06:12 AM
Haha. I bet $5 on Danowski winning.
In the IL write-up: "Danowski is one of just three players in ACC history to earn both Rookie of the Year and Player of the Year honors."
Don't they mean in the same year? Because I don't see that being so difficult (that only 3 players have done it) otherwise.
danowski wasnt a rookie this year. so, it
cant mean in the same year
Farny
05-31-2007, 01:10 PM
danowski wasnt a rookie this year. so, it
cant mean in the same year
No, I think it means he won ACC ROY and POY in the same year. ('04)
Well, maybe he didn't win them both in the same year. I think Joe Walters won POY in '04.
faceofflax15
05-31-2007, 01:53 PM
Awsome.
Why are people saying Rabil is a shoe in next year? Doesn't make sense, considering Ben Rubeor is only a junior as well..
MaKiMaKi13
05-31-2007, 02:09 PM
woohoo kristen kjellman , but yea congrats to danowski even tho he didnt win a championship he was still sick nasty
crusaderslax09
05-31-2007, 02:24 PM
Awsome.
Why are people saying Rabil is a shoe in next year? Doesn't make sense, considering Ben Rubeor is only a junior as well..
I would say Ruebor should be the front runner, (unless Danowski comes back, then hes the obvious choice), Ruebor was in second place for most of the season this year, IMO hes a better player than Rabil.
Farny
05-31-2007, 02:28 PM
Word. He was in first place for most of the season, if you ask me. Rubeor was averaging nearly 6 points a game over the entire first half of the season. He was blowing everyone away, and then he sort of faded...
Irishlax22
05-31-2007, 02:33 PM
Two shockers. They both deserved it. Im glad Donowski playing one bad game didnt affect the voting, after his amazing season.
laxr24
05-31-2007, 03:03 PM
I think Rubeor suffered some sort of injury mid-way through the season which hampered him the rest of the way. I'm glad Danowski won it, he was most deserving
Mista Hollywood
05-31-2007, 03:11 PM
psh danowski..*cough* *cough* paul rabil *cough*
Longpole5435
05-31-2007, 03:19 PM
Danowski is overrated, Rabil should have won it.
moondog
05-31-2007, 03:21 PM
Kristen Kjellman can take shots on me ANYTIME...
HdGLaxWarrior
05-31-2007, 03:48 PM
Kristen Kjellman can take shots on me ANYTIME...
haha yep... :agree:
kaboom22
05-31-2007, 08:59 PM
Seibald will.
Looks like Danowski's back for another year now. Chance to go back to back Tewaartons if he has a good enough season. Could see Zach Greer getting a shot at it though.
I think Max Seibald should have won it. Guess I'm alone.
He was a strong candidate and the most versatile of the finalists but I don't think a sophomore that doesn't play in the final will ever win it.
lax-crazy
06-01-2007, 03:09 PM
Looks like Danowski's back for another year now. Chance to go back to back Tewaartons if he has a good enough season. Could see Zach Greer getting a shot at it though.
he was in the running for some time, but he had a slump. I am sure if he doesnt have another slump he will be up there as a finalist
If Danowski goes back its pretty likely that the 4 of the five finalists will be the same, Danowski, Greer, Rabil, Seibald and Rubeor.
hopkinslax2
06-03-2007, 04:15 PM
I don't care how good Danowski was in the regular season, Paul Rabil was amazing in the championship game. Rabil had a goal and 5 assists. Rabil also had 5 ground bslls and two outstanding defensive plays. oh and by the way he led his team to a national championship victory. Danowski just can't say the same.
Again, it's based on the WHOLE SEASON. Danowski didn't win tournament MVP.