whats the difference

[bkaufmann]

whats the difference between a titan pro a titan classic and a titan classic lazer?

[CHRISLAX15]

the lazer has a shiny finish and warrior is engraved in te saft.

[bigzoinka17]

the titan pro is 10% lighter and 15% stronger than a titan classic. like bkaufmann said the lazer just has a cool finish on it, it looks pretty sweet. for a titan classic your lookin at $145 for attack and $230 for a pole. for a titan pro your lookin at $160 for attack, and $260 for a pole. im not sure what lazers run for but they are supposively great. my friend has a dpole lazer and its great.

[bkaufmann]

thanks for the info

[LaxMaxVince]

Are you considering buying one of them?

I persanally have the Titan Pro and I highly reccommend it.

[MACDADDY]

it says that the titan pro is 30% stronger than the strongest ALUMINUM alloys. doesn't say it is than the titan classic.


http://laxmonkey.com/warrior-lacrosse-shafts-titan-pro-atk-07.html

[bkaufmann]

laxmaxvince- actually i just bought a titan pro

[italianstalion]

What are you all tlaking about? The Titan Pro is not stronger than the Titan Classic. It is lighter and that is all. The material they use contains a little bit more titanium in it than the titan classic which is why they say it's stronger. The walls of the Titan pro are soo thin they are actually sharp like I could cut myself on them. I want to see someone take a Titan Classic to a Titan Pro and then tell me the Pro is stronger.

Macdaddy-All metal shafts are aluminum alloys so that is complete BS.

[bkaufmann]

italian stallion- at the store i looked at a titan pro and classic and ones not thicker or thinner